(no subject)
Oct. 1st, 2006 06:33 pmThe trouble with writing an epistolary story is that it's all done in letters.
yes. I said that. I said that today. it's because of that plotbunny I was talking about - and now that I've gotten my first official plotbunny in like AGES I declare them evil, evil. I couldn't wait for the actual text of the book, so I've gotten started by using a sparknotes guide. it's not like I'm going to absolutely rewrite the story, I just want its bones and its opportunity to write the way I knit - a new challenge or technique to learn.
so I'm writing an epistolary fic. I'll post it on
elaine_swan when the time comes.
but the thing about writing an epistolary story is that it is a form of omniscient, by definition. because in order to read a story contained entirely in letters, somebody had to have gathered and arranged those letters into a pile for us to read - whether the method of those letters being collected is explained or not.
I've opted for not. it doesn't matter how the letters came together. what matters is what's in them.
to tell a story in letters, that means that every character in the story has to have at least one person that they can trust and confide in about things that happened, and believe that the other person is going to give a fuck about what is written. there's also the problem of narrative gaps, which is also an advantage - you are not expected to describe the tapestries and every course for breakfast. there's also the problem of familiarity - if you are writing a letter to someone about someone else - and that someone is known to the adressed, describing them is going to look stilted. it's easier to just get to the point.
I've discovered already that it's possible to drop a letter - I already wrote a bit where the addressed had to turn around and write someone else about a letter they just recieved. I dropped that letter, and just wrote the reply, and on re-reading it, I think it works.
I also am a binge writer - I dashed off 2511 words so far today. letters. not totally in order, so I'm not ready to post anything just yet, and I have to decide - a post per letter? even though they are sometimes quite short?
or, should I arrange them like the book in Exchanges?
yes. I said that. I said that today. it's because of that plotbunny I was talking about - and now that I've gotten my first official plotbunny in like AGES I declare them evil, evil. I couldn't wait for the actual text of the book, so I've gotten started by using a sparknotes guide. it's not like I'm going to absolutely rewrite the story, I just want its bones and its opportunity to write the way I knit - a new challenge or technique to learn.
so I'm writing an epistolary fic. I'll post it on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
but the thing about writing an epistolary story is that it is a form of omniscient, by definition. because in order to read a story contained entirely in letters, somebody had to have gathered and arranged those letters into a pile for us to read - whether the method of those letters being collected is explained or not.
I've opted for not. it doesn't matter how the letters came together. what matters is what's in them.
to tell a story in letters, that means that every character in the story has to have at least one person that they can trust and confide in about things that happened, and believe that the other person is going to give a fuck about what is written. there's also the problem of narrative gaps, which is also an advantage - you are not expected to describe the tapestries and every course for breakfast. there's also the problem of familiarity - if you are writing a letter to someone about someone else - and that someone is known to the adressed, describing them is going to look stilted. it's easier to just get to the point.
I've discovered already that it's possible to drop a letter - I already wrote a bit where the addressed had to turn around and write someone else about a letter they just recieved. I dropped that letter, and just wrote the reply, and on re-reading it, I think it works.
I also am a binge writer - I dashed off 2511 words so far today. letters. not totally in order, so I'm not ready to post anything just yet, and I have to decide - a post per letter? even though they are sometimes quite short?
or, should I arrange them like the book in Exchanges?